It’s Stupid Time in Cleveland Sports
We don’t know if it is the cold weather or the piles of snow that have driven some people to the edge, but it is apparently stupid time in Cleveland sports.
First off was the report from WKNR* “contributor” Sabrina Parr (she’s not listed on the station’s website so we’re not sure what she does) that Browns coach Eric Mangini is done after the season regardless of how the team performs in its final three games. The station’s Chris Fedor, who is listed on the WKNR website as a producer, also claimed that the Browns can’t find a new offensive coordinator because no one is willing to work with Mangini.
Wait a minute, if there are coaches out there who don’t want to work with Mangini, why would it matter since the Browns are going to fire him anyway? Doesn’t the presumed removal of Mangini make the alleged reluctance of someone to work with him a moot point?
More importantly, if any of this were actually true, doesn’t it seem likely that one of the beat writers or columnists who cover this team on a daily basis would have come up with this news?
And doesn’t all this speculation actually run counter to what team president Mike Holmgren, the only person (other than owner Randy Lerner) who actually has a say in all this, said all along, that “The important point there I think is any coach, any staff where I am in the position I’m in, will be judged at the end of the season.”
Moving on.
The Plain Dealer‘s Tony Grossi and Bill Livingston must be dizzy from riding the quarterback carousel if their recent stories are any indication.
First off Grossi tries to sell us that the evolving Browns quarterback situation is somehow a case of the same old Browns:
“It’s Week 14 for the Browns and we’re still asking who’s the quarterback. Isn’t that the perfect metaphor for another Browns’ playoff-less season?”
In a follow-up article Grossi then painted the necessary quarterback switches as some kind of flaw on Mangini’s part:
“Naming Colt McCoy the Browns’ starting quarterback for the remainder of the season might not be a bombshell announcement. But it truly was out of character for Eric Mangini to commit to anybody at the position for longer than one game.”
“All that aside, the Browns, now out of playoff consideration, have had an unstable quarterback situation this year, which has been coach Eric Mangini’s norm.”
So let’s review: Jake Delhomme was the starter coming out of training camp, Seneca Wallace was the backup and Colt McCoy was No. 3. No mystery, no questions.
When Delhomme was injured Wallace took over as starter. When Wallace was injured McCoy took over as starter. There’s little reason to doubt that McCoy would still be the starter if hadn’t been injured. Just as there was little reason to rush him back before he was fully healed.
This hasn’t been a case of switching quarterbacks because they are not playing well; the Browns have a clear picture of the depth chart and acted accordingly when injuries hit.
Is that so hard to see?
***
We were going to include this gem from The PD’s Greg Kozarik, but it would be hard to top what the good folks at Two One Six Sports put together. Give it a read, you won’t be disappointed.
***
More on the silliness that is currently blowing through Cleveland sports can be found at Cleveland Frowns, and Waiting for Next Year.
***
*Full disclosure: Sirius is Red Right 88’s preferred official radio source. We haven’t listened to local sports talk in six years. Hearing that these are the types of “breaking news” stories the local stations put out just solidifies our position.
Stupid time indeed, thanks for the plug Pullo. I was actually just directed to the “QB Carousel” quotes this morning, and it's incredible to me how they try and make it look like it was Mangini's choice.
In Livingston's defense, he's always been that way. Not really much of an excuse for Grossi though.
One point to be made about Fedor's “No coordinators want to work with Mangini” comment: Is he contacting unemployed coordinators or coordinators currently under contract? Depending on which category that they fall under, you would probably get two VERY different answers. The latter of the two would constitute tampering as well.
My guess is that he pulled it out of his [hat]. Shocking, I know.
I just wish we knew what the agenda is behind all this. It was more understandable last year, but I really don't think the anti-Mangini views represent what the fans are truly saying/feeling.
And certainly there are more fans making their opinions known this year than in the past.
I came across a report the other day, pure speculation, that if the Browns do change offensive coordinators then Jim Zorn would be interested because of his ties to Holmgren. So there is at least one name that wouldn't be opposed to working with Mangini.
I just can't fathom why we waste so much time writing about Toni Grossi and his ilk. It's not like he opinion mattered anytime in the last twenty years. WKNR and the Plain Dealer are jokes. Do we really need to fight off the intellectual criticisms of Grossi, Fedor and Parr? Oh and please do me a favor with Jim Zorn, that was some guy who needed a blog post apparently.(Even though he's generally pretty good.)